Can we Bridge AI’s responsibility gap at Will?

Abstract Artificial intelligence (AI) increasingly executes tasks that previously only humans could do, such as drive a car, fight in war, or perform medical operation. However, the very best AI systems tend to be least controllable and transparent, some scholars argued can no longer morally responsible for of AI-caused outcomes, which would then result responsibility gap. In this paper, I assume, sake argument, at most sophisticated do indeed create gaps, ask whether we bridge these gaps will , viz. certain people take harm simply by performing speech act, just give permission something act consent. So understood, taking genuine normative power. first discuss reject view Champagne Tonkens, who advocate liability . According view, military commander must, ahead time, accept blame punishment any caused autonomous weapon under her command. defend my own proposal answerability makes themselves answerable systems, not time but also when has already been caused.